11/29/2023 0 Comments Icecat download![]() Neither a 64-bit program can run on a 32 bit operating system like Raspbian nor can an X86 program run on an ARM processor.Īm I wrong to assume that these Ubuntu instructions would work for other Debian like systems such as Raspbian? But the most imporant information is that it is a 64-bit executable compiled for X86 (intel proccesor). usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID=d043e81b32b71a57818b9aa510aced22459e40d7, strippedĪs you can see icecat is an executable ELF file so you cannot start it as shell script with sh /usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat as you did. Now if I look at icecat with file I find: rpi ~$ file /usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat Rpi ~$ sudo tar -xvf icecat* -C /usr/bin/icecat/installed First I had to create it with before unpacking the archive: rpi ~$ sudo mkdir -p /usr/bin/icecat/installed If I follow your commands, first I get an error massage tar: /usr/bin/icecat/installed: Cannot open: No such file or directory. usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: 2: /usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: Syntax error: Unterminated quoted stringĪm I doing something wrong? Am I wrong to assume that these Ubuntu instructions would work for other Debian like systems such as Raspbian? usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: 10: /usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: ��A�� usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: 1: /usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: not found usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: 1: /usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: cannot open �0�A3: No such file usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: 2: /usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: not found usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: 1: /usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/ice: not found ![]() usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: 1: /usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat: ELF: not found sudo tar -xvf icecat* -C /usr/bin/icecat/installedĬorrectly extracts it, but $ sh /usr/bin/icecat/installed/icecat/icecat
0 Comments
11/29/2023 0 Comments Samsung flow failed to register device![]() However, these devices aren't ready to have one or more software update workloads managed by the service. Devices showing up in this tab were successfully registered with Windows Autopatch. The purpose of this tab is to help you identify and remediate devices that failed to pass one or more post-device registration readiness checks. The purpose of this tab is to show devices that were successfully registered with the Windows Autopatch service. Each tab is designed to provide a different set of device readiness statuses so the IT admin knows where to go to monitor, and fix potential device health issues. Windows Autopatch has three tabs within its device blade. If devices fail to register, the devices are listed in the Not registered tab. However, even if the device(s)is successfully registered, they can be part of Not ready tab. When devices successfully register with the service, the devices are listed in the Registered tab. Registered devices can appear in the Registered, Not ready, or Not registered tabs. Devices must have Serial Number, Model and Manufacturer.Last Intune device check in completed within the last 28 days.Must switch the following Microsoft Configuration Manager co-management workloads to Microsoft Intune (either set to Pilot Intune or Intune):. ![]()
11/29/2023 0 Comments Adobe premiere pro price per yearEach of these are packed with features to get you from a collection of source footage to a final cut as quickly as possible and with the highest quality possible. These days, professional video editing software often means one of Avid Media Composer, Adobe Premiere Pro or Apple Final Cut Pro. To the extent that it helps, we'll break the contenders down into categories. Which video editing software you ultimately choose is going to depend on a number of factors ranging from what capabilities you need to how much you are willing to spend. Remember there is a free version of DaVinci Resolve (Public Beta) available but in order to access more editing tools and features, you would have to purchase DaVinci Resolve Studio.So, you have a bunch of video and you want to edit it together into something that tells a story - you're going to need some video editing software. Blackmagic Design announced DaVinci Resolve 18.5 earlier this year, an update featuring 4 new AI tools for transcribing, classifying audio, adding virtual lighting to a scene and generating subtitles quickly. It is packed with features that will enhance your work from basic amateur editing to professionally graded content.ĭaVinci Resolve is also miles ahead in integrating AI features that make the editing process quicker and more effective. If you are a professional videographer looking to advance your colour correction and colour grading skills, then DaVinci Resolve is definitely the software for you. ![]() Ultimately, the choice between the two video editing software depends on your specific needs, preferences and existing software. Which video editing software is better – DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro? This means you either have to be subscribed to After Effects as well or Adobe Creative Cloud to be able to make motion effects. Premiere Pro offers some colour editing tools and limited graphic templates as more extensive tools for video effects can be found in another Adobe application – After Effects. VAT) or you can get it for free with a Blackmagic Design purchase (Ts&Cs apply).Ĭolour correction and colour grading are DaVinci Resolve’s main strength. This paid version can be bought outright for $295/£294 (incl. T he paid version, DaVinci Resolve Studio includes more tools and a collaborative workflow that a more seasoned video editor would require, as well as improved hardware acceleration giving quicker rendering. If you are a beginner or just a creative on a budget, you might be considering the cheapest option available.ĭaVinci Resolve takes the lead as they offer a free version packed with a variety of features that can be used to produce a great video. One of the first things to consider is availability and affordability. DaVinci Resolve vs Premiere Pro: price and availability This side-by-side comparison will help you make the right decision based on how and what you intend to produce. Making the choice of which video editing software to use can be difficult if you don’t know much about the functionality of either program. What are the main differences between DaVinci Resolve and Premiere Pro? You can also check out more video editing software including free tools here. Since then, DaVinci Resolve has been converted into a non-linear editing platform with features that can be compared with those in Premiere Pro. ![]() It worked with programs like Premiere Pro and Final Cut Pro, offering more colour-grading capabilities. Because Premier Pro was designed to be a non-linear editing program, there are more resources and a more significant support platform for users.ĭaVinci Resolve was released in 2004 by Da Vinci Systems and acquired by Blackmagic Design in 2009. Premiere Pro, which is now part of the Adobe Creative Cloud that we know today, was released in 2002 with more professional features and is constantly updated each year. Adobe Premiere, launched in 1991, was one of the first non-linear editing systems and worked exclusively on MacOS. 11/29/2023 0 Comments Season 3 halo infiniteThere'll be over 100 items for players to unlock, and if they purchase the battle pass, they'll be able to unlock all of the premium items featured in it. With the new season, players can expect a new battle pass. In Escalation Slayer, you'll need to kill an enemy with the Odd Ball to win.
11/29/2023 0 Comments Zen nail spa new hampshire![]()
11/28/2023 0 Comments Evga 1660 ti![]() This has also allowed NVIDIA to opt for cheaper 12Gbps GDDR6 VRAM, marking the first time we’ve seen this in any video card.įinally, taking a look at power consumption, we see that NVIDIA is going to be holding the line at 120W, which is the same TDP as the GTX 1060 6GB. This puts GTX 1660 Ti in an interesting spot in terms of memory bandwidth, since it’s benefitting from the jump to GDDR6 if you thought the GTX 1060 could use a little more memory bandwidth, GTX 1660 Ti gets it in spades. ![]() The flip side being that at least they aren’t trying to ship a card with just a 128-bit memory bus, as was the case for GTX 960. I’ll fully admit I would have liked to have seen 8GB here, but then that was the case for RTX 2060 as well. Speaking of memory bandwidth, NVIDIA’s continued use of a 192-bit memory bus in this segment continues to be a somewhat vexing choice since it leads to such odd memory amounts. Or to frame things in reference to the GTX 1060 6GB it replaces, on the new card offers around 24% more compute/shader throughput (before taking architecture into account), a much smaller 4% increase in ROP throughput, and a very sizable 50% increase in memory bandwidth. However the drop in the SM count definitely hits compute and texture performance, where GTX 1660 Ti is going to deliver around 85% of RTX 2060’s compute and shading throughput. The end result is that, on paper, the GTX 1660 Ti actually has a bit more ROP pixel pushing power than its bigger sibling thanks to that 5% boost clock advantage. In an added quirk, the GTX 1660 Ti actually has a slightly higher average boost clockspeed than the RTX 2060, with its 1770Mhz clockspeed giving it a 5% edge here. But past that, the two cards are closer in specifications than we might expect to see for a $70 price tag difference, especially as NVIDIA has kept the 6GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit memory bus. For this fully-enabled TU116 card, NVIDIA has dialed back on the number of SMs a bit, going from 30 to 24, and memory clockspeeds have dropped as well, from 14Gbps to 12Gbps. Or to flip things around the other direction, versus the older Pascal and Maxwell-based video cards, it comes with all of Turing’s performance and efficiency benefits for traditional graphics workloads.Ĭompared to RTX 2060 then, the GTX 1660 Ti is actually rather similar. This means that it has the same core architecture in its SMs, and is directly comparable to the likes of the RTX 2060. We’ll go into the full ramifications of what NVIDIA has (and hasn’t) taken out of TU116 on the next page, but at a high level it’s still every bit a Turing GPU, save the RTX functionality (RT and tensor cores). Launching today at $279, it’s destined to replace NVIDIA’s GTX 1060 6GB in the market and is NVIDIA’s new challenger for the mainstream video card market. Kicking things off in turn for this new GPU is NVIDIA’s latest video card, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. That GPU is TU116, and it’s part of what will undoubtedly become a new sub-family of Turing GPUs for NVIDIA as the company starts rolling out Turing into the lower half of the video card market. Which is all workable for NVIDIA in the high-end market where they are unchallenged and can essentially dictate video card prices, but it’s another matter entirely once you start approaching the mid-range, where the AMD competition is alive and well.Ĭonsequently, in preparing for their cheaper, sub-$300 Turing cards, NVIDIA had to make a decision: do they keep the RT and tensor cores in order to offer these features across the line – at a literal cost to both consumers and NVIDIA – or do they drop these features in order to make a leaner, more competitive chip? As it turns out, NVIDIA has opted for the latter, producing a new Turing GPU that is leaner and meaner than anything that’s come before it, but also very different from its predecessors for this reason. And while the full economic consequences that go with that decision are NVIDIA’s to bear, for the first year or so of Turing’s life, all of that die space that is driving up NVIDIA’s costs isn’t going to contribute to improving NVIDIA’s performance in traditional games it’s a value-added feature. The end result is that all of the Turing chips we’ve seen thus far, from TU102 to TU106, are monsters in size even TU106 is 445mm 2, never mind the flagship TU102. In the second sense however, NVIDIA also bet big on GPU die size: these new features would take up a lot of space on the 12nm FinFET process they’d be using. In the first sense, NVIDIA dedicated whole logical blocks to brand-new graphics and compute features – ray tracing and tensor core compute – and they would need to sell developers and consumers alike on the value of these features, something that is no easy task. When NVIDIA put their plans for their consumer Turing video cards into motion, the company bet big, and in more ways than one. 11/28/2023 0 Comments Steam kerbal space program 2![]() Due to the aforementioned unique functionality, I'm going to leave the SteamOS in place but am going to try to multiboot it (with GRUB2 if I must, depending on how much of the multiboot functionality is available via the bios and a USB-C connected SDD if I can get it to work well enough). It's been years since I've had anything that I was happy with. I'm really looking forward to trying this one. I have a hardware graveyard of ultra-portables that I picked up in Japan over the years, juuust in case I ever need any of them again someday. It's a short form-factor, but 1TB modules in that size are available, and by the time Deck arrives, there might be 2TB versions already.Īin't that the truth. And even with that, Valve has confirmed that they are using off-the-shelf M.2, so even if it's not designed to be user-replaced, it should be possible. I was actually looking at GPD WIN 3 for this very reason, but Steam Deck completely surpasses it in every way except for on-board memory. If I can find a nice keyboard, or better yet, if someone makes a flip cover with a keyboard specifically designed for deck, I might try using it as an on-the-go PC. They just never took off here like they did in Japan. Yeah, it's hard to get a good ultra-portable made for US markets. So we'll just have to see how much of an impact that makes in OS selection. On the other hand, new people coming onto the platform might feel differently. I'm just not sure it's critical for most PC gamers. Yeah, there will definitely be some unique functionality with Steam OS. I can't wait to get my hands on mine, I totally want to try to replace my laptop (not just my switch) with it. Maybe it won't make everyone switch to gaming on Linux, but surely is going to dispell some preconceptions about gaming on Linux and even overall PC gaming. Since the console interface is going to replace Big Picture it will still be there in Windows and the same can be said for the controls, but there are some functions that may be low level enough that it would require direct support for Windows on the Deck by Valve, like the "plug and play library on a SD card" one or the suspend/resume feature. ![]() I think there's a threshold dictaded by how it "just works" out of the box with Linux vs how messy is to set up Windows in it. So we might not see as much Linux gaming on Deck as people imagine right now. So long as AMD provides compatible graphics drivers, it shouldn't be a problem. Also, I'm not entirely sure that majority of gamers on Steam Deck aren't going to just pave over the Steam OS with W10/11 install instead. 11/28/2023 0 Comments Xmedia recode change resolutionIt also doesn't require you to do anything in the command line, like mp4fpsmod requires you to do. I mentioned XMedia Recode because ffmpeg was mentioned, and that one app can do both things, instead of having to download two different apps to do those two different things. Yes, those both work, too, and can accomplish the same things XMedia Recode can. Use Avidemux instead, or fix the mp4 file framerate with mp4fpsmod. For instance, if the original file is encoded at a bitrate of 10 MB/sec, then you'll want to set the bitrate setting in XMedia Recode to at least 10 MB/sec to minimize any loss in quality.Īnyway, hopefully this helps OP get the output file they're hoping to get, without noticing any drop in video quality or sync-ing issues. Just remember that if you're going to convert the file, then you want to make sure all the other settings are going to result in a high quality file. ![]() It'll show up as something like "24.1569871 frames per second".) If it's a Variable Frame Rate, then the frame rate won't be an even a round number. (If you don't know the frame rate, you can play the file in VLC, and then go to Tools > Media Information and it will display the frame rate. Instead, you want to specify the constant frame rate closest to the file - whether it's 24 frames per second, 29.97 frames, or anything else. This is no good if your source file was encoded using a Variable Frame Rate. By default in both, it's set to something like "Use Source File Frame Rate". In both Handbrake and XMedia Recode, there is an option to set the frame rate. Depending on OP's ultimate goal, it might be worth doing. It tries to compensate, but it ends up with the audio out of sync.Īnyhow, there's a fairly simple fix, but it does require re-encoding the file. The disadvantage I have run into is that they aren't friendly to re-editing because the editing app is usually expecting a Constant Frame Rate. The supposed advantage is that it keeps the file size down, while at the same time ensuring that pixelation and other digital artifacts are kept to a minimum. "Variable Frame Rate" will add more frames to scenes with lots of moving action, while subtracting frames from scenes that are mostly static. Whether using ffmpeg, Handbrake, or XMedia Recode, you will run into the same issue.Ī lot of people encode files using a "Variable Frame Rate" which means that the file isn't using exactly 24/frames per second (or whatever the frame rate happens to be). Whenever I have audio sync-ing issues after converting a file as OP has described, about 90% of the time it has to do with the frame rate. However, I think OP might want to investigate a little bit further. Go ahead and process the file, and it'll output the same audio and video but now as an mp4 file, without having done any converting. So you can switch your mkv file to mp4 without affecting any quality by setting both the "Video" and "Audio" tabs to "Copy" instead of "Convert". If you select "Copy" then the app doesn't do any re-encoding. Each tab gives you the option to simply "Copy" or else "Convert" the audio and video and configure the settings that you want for your resulting file. There is also an "Audio" tab and a "Video" tab. In the window, set both the "Format" and "File Extension" dropdowns to "mp4". ![]() XMedia Recode is just a front-end for ffmpeg, which makes the app a bit more user-friendly.įor OP, they would simply drag and drop their mkv file into the XMedia Recode app. I would take this one step further and recommend Xmedia Recode if OP is a Windows user. Includes technical help requests.įor the complete flair guide, visit the Flairs tab. ![]() Restoration/Preservation is for old movies that have been restored.Īnnouncement is for fan editors to announce new upcoming projects or make a post about a work in progress.įanedit Request is for users in searching for a specific fanedit that they cannot find, or requesting a fanedit to be made.ĭiscussion is for discussing fanedits, ideas for new edits, and editing. Series is for edits that retain an episodic form. Short is for standalone fanedits that are under 40 minutes. Includes FanMixes, FanFixes, and TV-to-Film.įeature Trailer is for trailers of upcoming features or series.Ĭlip is for clips from feature-length fan edits, as a way to preview specific changes, or a stand-alone clip. Rules > Post Flairs Explained > Online Fanedit List > Message the Mod Team >įeature is for posting fully recut films & TV series, also known as feature-length fanedits.Please read the rules before contributing and have fun. Find fanedits, post your own, get help editing, post fan edit news, and share reviews. A community for faneditors and their audiences. 11/28/2023 0 Comments Wise care 365 usb portable![]() ![]() Set the temperature unit displayed in Wise Care 365, such as hardware temperature and weather temperature. Set the frequency of automatically checking for new versions of Wise Care 365. Turn on or off the display at Context Menu. 1.4 Add shred file/folder to Context Menu The file size and the number of traces only need to meet one of them, and Wise Turbo will prompt you to clean it up. If you choose this option, it will close the window and uncheck the option Run Wise Turbo automatically when either of the following happens. This option will close the Wise Notice window and displays it again when the next task runs. If you click the Clean Now button, it will open the Wise Care 365 main window, scan, and clean the system automatically. ![]() The drop-down menu of the Clean Now button provides the other 2 options: Remind Later, Never Show again. The second time is at the set task time (the default is the time when Wise Care 365 was first installed). The first time, 5 minutes after the computer starts. Wise Care 365 runs Wise Turbo twice a day. You will see a prompt message in the lower right corner of the desktop coming from Wise Turbo when the size of junk files or the number of traces exceeds the threshold. Wise Turbo will check the system periodically. When the system starts, Wise Boot Booster will run automatically, showing the time spent on this boot and the most time-consuming item. If Wise Care 365 is now running, this will also close Wise Care 365.ġ.2 Run Bootup Booster when the computer starts Open the settings window of Wise Care 365.Ĭlose the tray program. Right-click on the tray icon can call out the context menu, it has 4 options. Wise Care 365 Tray program will run automatically when the system starts. 11/28/2023 0 Comments Parallel desktop ram![]() It even exceeds brief testing done natively in Boot Camp, and so we chalk its large result up to the way that Windows 8 is virtualized. ![]() The result, far greater than its Windows 7 counterparts, was verified in multiple tests. If we focus on Parallels in DirectX 9 mode, the green bar, we see that its performance, while still ahead of Fusion, is greatly reduced.Īn anomaly that is clear from the results is Windows 8 performance on the creativity and computation tests in both Fusion and Parallels. One area where Parallels is significantly ahead of Fusion is in the Entertainment section of the benchmark, although it should be noted that this is due to Parallel’s ability to run DirectX 10 benchmarks that are included as part of the test. On Windows 7, Parallels in both DirectX configurations enjoys a slight performance lead over Fusion. We also tested Windows 8 performance in both applications, as is noted in the graphs below.įuturemark’s PCMark benchmark attempts to evaluate overall system performance, and includes tests for computational tasks, image and video playback and manipulation, web browsing, gaming, and storage speed. Unsure as to exactly how Parallels was implementing DirectX 10, and curious about whether its implementation would cause performance variations outside of applications that called for DirectX 10, we ran separate tests for Parallels in both DirectX 9 and 10 configurations. Parallels 8 provides “experimental” support for DirectX 10, Microsoft’s set of multimedia APIs, while Fusion only supports up to DirectX 9. Some tests were not possible in certain configurations, and those are noted below. ![]() This was to ensure that there would be plenty of space for all the virtual machines, as well as to eliminate any potential drive or interface bottlenecks.Įxcept where otherwise noted, all tests were performed three times, and the results, as long as they were within 5 percent of each other, were averaged. The virtual machines were all stored on an external Pegasus R4 Thunderbolt RAID array with four 3 TB mechanical hard drives in a RAID 5 configuration. The configuration options don’t completely translate between applications, but each was set up to maximize the performance of the virtual machine over that of the host OS. We compared Parallels Desktop 8.0.181 with Fusion 5.0.1 and measured their ability to run the 64-bit versions of Windows 7 Professional and Windows 8 Pro.īoth virtualization applications were configured to use four of the iMac’s eight logical processors and 4 GB of RAM. Our tests were performed on a 2011 27-inch iMac at 3.4 GHz with 16 GB of RAM running OS X 10.8.1. If there is high demand for benchmarking other configurations, please let us know and we will do our best to accomodate requests. However, most Mac consumers will use the software to virtualize a recent version of Windows, so we have focused our benchmarking efforts on that configuration. Armed with the latest software from both companies, we can now take a look at how well Mac users can expect to run Windows in the coming year.īoth applications can virtualize a myriad of operating systems, including OS X, nearly all versions of Windows, and multiple Linux varieties. Just a few days later, Parallels Desktop 8, the primary competitor to Fusion in the consumer OS X virtualization market, launched. Last week, we benchmarked VMware Fusion 5 and found that it offered a consistent performance increase over its predecessor, Fusion 4. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |